Grand Illusion_Tara Donovan by Diane Solway

Grand Illusion

In her home as in her art, Tara Donovan creates a world of wonders.

Sculptor Tara Donovan has made a career out of seeing the marvelous in the mundane, and so it was that in a ramshackle auto-body garage in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, she glimpsed her dream house. Feisty, earthy and up for adventure, Donovan, 38, spied the building three years ago and, when she found herself in a bidding war, threw in one of her works to snag the deal. Today it looks like nothing else on the block, which is crammed with bodegas, modest brick homes and factories-turned-lofts. In the same way that she transforms the everyday materials that make up her work—in her hands, plastic cups call to mind mounds of melting snow, and pencils multiply into sprawling cities—Donovan has turned the gritty space into a striking sculpture of glass and stucco.

Sparking a sense of wonder in the viewer is something of her stock in trade. Step inside Donovan’s front door, and the first thing you see is a narrow stacked staircase that leads your eye to the glass floor above it. At first you think it’s a mirror. But then light comes flooding through the glass, leading your eye up another 17 feet to skylights in the ceiling. Seeing my response to this optical illusion, Donovan recalls the night her dealer, PaceWildenstein’s Marc Glimcher, came to visit: “I laid facedown on the glass floor so that when he looked up, he thought I was flying—or about to come crashing down!”

Donovan’s ingenuity and industry are on view everywhere in her home-cum-studio. Her first major museum survey opens at the Institute of Contemporary Art/Boston in October, and in her ground-floor studio, four young female assistants sit around a table as if at a quilting bee, gluing together Styrofoam cups and chatting noisily. Over their heads thousands of the cups are amassed in what looks like a bulging, giant foamy cloud. (The piece, first made in 2005, will be shipped in sections and reassembled on-site.)

Donovan jokes around with the women as she leads me to a brand-new work, to be installed in a museum wall facing Boston Harbor. Seen from afar, it suggests a block of intricately carved ice or undulating waves in an aquarium, but, in fact, it’s made of nothing more than plain old plastic sheeting, unfurled from rolls and folded over and onto itself. Twenty-four feet wide by four feet high, it will be visible from both sides. “I discovered this kind of kaleidoscopic, optical thing it does,” says Donovan, whose pale skin and smoky blue eyes are framed by a perky black bob. Increasingly her work has focused on the way translucent materials affect perception. “I think in terms of infinity—of [the materials] expanding. I’m interested in this idea of a visual, expansive field that has shifting viewpoints.”

Resembling topographies or biomorphic forms, her large-scale works often resonate with the complex geometry found in the natural world. Donovan chooses her material before seeing what she can make of it, using vast quantities of the same mass-produced item and laboriously building forms through careful accumulation until she finds what ICA chief curator Nicholas Baume calls “the tipping point,” when the toothpick or cup ceases to be itself and becomes something entirely different.

The end result “is visually seductive,” says David McFadden, chief curator of New York’s Museum of Arts and Design, where Donovan’s Bluffs—a coral reef made of glued-together plastic buttons—will be featured in a new show, “Second Lives,” opening in September. “From a distance her work gives the impression of being made of something extraordinarily precious. But as you get closer, you realize that the preciousness is the effect that she achieves, not the preciousness of anything that she’s used.”

Donovan forages in surplus and grocery stores but doesn’t look too hard for materials. “It’s a matter of deciding, Okay, I’m going to buy those cups. I don’t need plastic cups, but I’m going to get ’em and then mess around with them until I get an answer,” she says. “It’s a very organic, intuitive and observant process. I see where I wind up.” She doesn’t care that they’re cups—what interests her is “exploiting the physical characteristics of the thing that have nothing to do with what it’s used for.”

By way of example, she shows me her second-floor office, her “clean studio,” she calls it, which is reserved for experiments such as the one now in progress: Holding a contraption that unspools thread, an assistant stands over a four-sided area, shooting silver thread into it until the thread begins to suggest a windswept haystack.

“Right now it looks like a bad fiber-arts project,” Donovan explains. “I’m still working it out. The idea is to make it not thread on a spool anymore, and not thread as a string, but thread as this massive, tangled thing. Sometimes the answers come quickly; sometimes they’re a real struggle.”

Fortunately, building her house was far from a struggle—though it was still a construction site when she moved in last fall. Then again, Donovan had lived for years literally on top of her work in a loft-studio in Bushwick, Brooklyn, where she couldn’t get out of bed without knocking her head on the ceiling. “I always wanted to design a house,” she says, and as she points out the materials she chose for the third-floor living space—the gray stone for the fireplace (“I told the architect, ‘Think Brady Bunch!’”), the penny tiles in the bathroom, the Garolite (what circuit boards are made of) fronting the cabinets—she radiates enthusiasm. “I love not having to move hot-glue guns to eat dinner!” she says, erupting into peals of laughter.

The house has other happy associations: During its design, Donovan met her husband, Robbie Crawford, who works for her architect and made the final model. They married last September in a community garden on New York’s Lower East Side and were serenaded up the street by an old-time string band. Their wedding present from the groom’s parents (his father had worked for Jim Henson) was a puppet show about how they met, performed during the ceremony. “We had a killer wedding,” recalls Donovan, who wore a Chloé minidress and created the cake’s topper—a bride and groom with wooden faces painted to resemble the real ones.

A gourmet cook, Donovan has been “crafty,” she says, since her earliest days, beginning with her older sister’s school projects, including “a Pueblo Indian village made out of all the crap in the house.” The family lived outside Nyack, New York, and Donovan’s father owned a pub near the World Trade Center, though he was largely absent from her life after her parents divorced when she was 12. Even as a sophomore at the Corcoran College of Art and Design, “Tara was not afraid to do something outrageous scalewise,” says her former professor and mentor Kendall Buster. She tended bar and waited tables for six years before starting grad school at Virginia Commonwealth University, though she didn’t quit her day job until 2003, when her first New York solo show, at Ace Gallery, proved a breakout success.

Last fall Donovan became one of the few contemporary artists to create a work for the Metropolitan Museum of Art. She curled Mylar tape into tiny loops, installed them in clusters on a wall and lit them with spotlights. You felt you were floating in a bottle of club soda. The sculpture will be remade for the ICA survey, which will feature 17 pieces and then travel to Cincinnati; Des Moines, Iowa; and San Diego.

While Donovan is hardly the first to use everyday materials, her work runs counter to much of the sculpture and installation art now in fashion, says ICA’s Baume, referring to works made of “very collaged materials” that have in common what he calls “a tenuous existence and tendency to implode and fall apart. Then you have someone like Tara, whose work is incredibly rigorous and formal, with a very precise relationship to specific materials.”

Artist Chuck Close, a friend who shares many of her preoccupations, goes further: “At this particular moment in the art world, invention and personal vision have been demoted in favor of appropriation, of raiding the cultural icebox. For somebody to go out and try to make something that doesn’t remind you of anybody else’s work and is really, truly innovative—and I think Tara’s work is—that’s very much against the grain of the moment. To me, it represents a gutsy move.”

Donovan concludes her house tour on the roof, with its sweeping views of the Williamsburg Bridge, pointing out the spot where she plans to install a hot tub—an almost unheard-of luxury in New York. Her mother, she recalls, wasn’t at all happy about Donovan’s decision to choose art school over a more traditional college. “Art school didn’t exactly equal a job!” Donovan says, laughing. “She’s happy now.”

SEE MORE ArtistsBrooklynChuck Close

DON’T MISS A THING

Sign up for the latest from W editors.

SIGN UP

FACEBOOK

 

TWITTER

 

EMAIL

Art: Ernesto Neto and the Legacy of the Neo-Concrete Movement by Alex Kittle

HTTP://ALEXKITTLE.COM/2014/03/25/ART-ERNESTO-NETO-AND-THE-LEGACY-OF-THE-NEO-CONCRETE-MOVEMENT/

ARTARTISTS

Art: Ernesto Neto and the Legacy of the Neo-Concrete Movement

March 25, 2014 • 0 Comments

After Picasso and George Braque pioneered the geometric forms of Cubism in the early twentieth century, many artists sought to make their own mark on the new genre. In the succeeding decades, various movements sprung out of Cubism, from the motion-focused compositions of fascist Futurists to the primary color rectangles of De Stijl. By the 1930s, a style known as Concrete Art emerged, emphasizing extreme flatness, rational forms, and a distancing from reality. Concrete Art was practiced in various regions, becoming especially popular in Brazil. But some artists were dissatisfied with this practical, almost mathematic approach, and sought an alternative.

In Brazil in the late 50s, a group of artists led by Lygia Clark and Hélio Oiticica founded the Neo-concrete Movement. These artists sought to combine the structured approach of Minimalist and Constructivist styles with a deeper communication of feeling. Their manifesto (penned by poet Ferreira Gullar) speaks out against “the kind of concrete art that is influenced by a dangerously acute rationalism” and encourages concrete art to be “reevaluated with reference to their power of expression rather than to the theories on which they based their art.” These artists felt their movement was “born out of the need to express the complex reality of modern humanity inside the structural language of a new plasticity,” focusing on personal expression and thus contrary to the scientific and positivist ideas running through much Western art of the time. Fascinated by the effects of color on the viewer, Oiticica painted energetic minimal canvases and created complex box sculptures known as Bólides (Fireballs) which viewers could touch and open. In the early 1960s, Clark began making interactive metal sculptures called Bichos (Critters)- geometric shapes attached by hinges which could be moved and re-positioned by the viewer.

Hélio Oiticica: Metaesquema No. 348, 1958. via MoMA

Hélio Oiticica: B11 Box Bólide 09, 1964. via Tate Modern

Like many artists seeking to re-define visual practices in the 1960s, these artists tended to focus on color, simplicity, and sensation in their work. They sought to connect with viewers on an instinctive level, encouraging personal interaction and multiple interpretations. Now, several decades later, Brazilian artist Ernesto Neto builds upon their ideas in his innovative sculptural installation projects. Born in Rio de Janeiro in 1964, Neto has become known for his use of Lycra as well as his mutable, touchable works. In 1989, he filled Lycra nets with lead balls and styrofoam pellets, creating flexible groups of amorphous objects. By the mid-90s, he was filling his Lycra forms with organic materials, including pungent spices, which oozed through the material and filled the space with intermingled scents and colorful pigments.

Ernesto Neto: PUFF (turmeric), 1997. via Tanya Bonakdar Gallery

Ernesto Neto: We Stopped Just Here at the Time, 2002. via My Art Agenda

Ernesto Neto: While Nothing Happens, 2008. via Nicola Anthony

Ernesto Neto: Madness is Part of Life, 2012. via Inhale Mag

From there, Neto moved into large-scale installation, with more and more focus on viewer participation. In a series of works he called Céus (“Skies”), he suspended Lycra netting from the ceiling, hanging large sacks of spices in towering formations. They filled the gallery space, resulting in a forest of translucent, skin-like forms that surround the viewer both visually and olfactorily. Neto has since expanded into fully interactive sculpture: room-size netting through which visitors can walk and play and move. He says that these works had “acquire[d] the status of bodies that could be folded in on themselves, and I realized that immersion within the body allowed me to appreciate the other side of the skin” (quoted in Art in Latin America: 1990-2010, 25). This emphasis on touching and physical feeling is also seen in his Humanoids, which are puffy sculptures made of Lycra tulle stuffed with styrofoam balls, with spaces for participants to sit, stand, and hug.

I read about Neto for the first time just a week ago, and was instantly infatuated with his work. I’ve always been drawn to immersive installation environments, and have lately become especially interested in tactile and sensual impact. Like many art critics, I soon connected Neto’s work to Lygia Clark, who devoted her later career to therapeutic sculpture and performance. Through masks and other objects she sought healing for her participants. To me, Neto’s work seems just as healing; it is about comfort, and quietude, and warmth. A lot of Minimalist sculpture is associated with coldness, hardness, and distance, but he makes it inviting, and even meditative. His sculpture is utterly simple, taking rounded forms and imbuing them with intriguing interactive qualities. Viewers become absorbed into the work, blurring the boundaries of the standard viewer/artwork relationship. With warm colors, soothing textures, and soft forms, Neto creates a surreal world for his viewer to inhabit, one that is familiar in its materials but fantastic in its structures. Like the Neo-concretists, he stresses emotional response over a rational approach, and seeks a confluence of art and experience. I feel moved by his work even though I haven’t seen it in real life, the ideas alone are enough to make me smile as I imagine sinking into one of his singular constructions.

Mostly I really want huggable sculpture. Really, really.

Ernesto Neto: Humanoids Family, 2001. via Tanya Bonakdar Gallery

Ernesto Neto: The Ovaloids’ Meeting, 1998. via Tanya Bonakdar Gallery

Ernesto Neto: Celula Nave, 2004. via The Art Gardner

Ernesto Neto: Navedenga, 1998. via Tanya Bonakdar Gallery

Ernesto Neto: Edges of the World, 2010. via The Art Blog

Sources:

Iria Candela. Art in Latin America: 1990-2010. Translated by Chris Miller. Tate Publishing, 2013.

Fereira Gullar. “Neo-concrete Manifesto.” Jornal do Brasil, March 22, 1959. Translated by Dawn Ades.

Emily Moore. “Ernesto Neto.” Pulse: Art, Healing, and Transformation. Edited by Jessica Morgan. Steidl for Institute of Contemporary Art, Boston, 2003.

Air defense hood 防空ずきん quotes from Wikipedia translated in English by google translate

Air defense hood

Source: the free encyclopedia “Wikipedia (Wikipedia)”

Women who have suffered air defense hood

Air defense hood and the (air defense cowl), the Pacific War was used in Japan of late, air raid is a hood to protect the neck and face from falling objects at the time of. At the same time hair Osaekomi, and also serves to prevent the hair is burns.

shape

In a way that covers the shoulder and neck comfortably and, the cotton and cotton cushioning material has been used as, it is intended to protect the head from the impact of falling objects and debris. Helmet Eteshite defense force from it is not a hard material, such as was not much hope, but by wear wet in water incendiary due to fire also to protect the head from heat and sparks of were available .

As the shape stitched the two sides of the rectangular cushion, other things like fitted with a cord extending from the back of the neck, covering the head hood something like hanging cushion extending to the shoulder to have been left behind. When worn, tie under the chin a string extending from the back of the neck.

World War II end-stage in Japan air superiority can not be ensured, subject to nationwide air raid damage in Japan mainland, it focused bombing a row, especially urban areas where key point there was a military base and government agencies We, the damage to the citizens were routinely occur. For this reason, in order to protect themselves from these 1943 are available from the around. Of course, hit or fall and come bombs and incendiary, or fighters strafe it was Mamanaranaka’ to prevent, bomb shelter fall or debris when the bunker was collapsed by the impact of retreated to still bombing, and爆散the effect of the degree to prevent debris such as flying to come bombs and anti-aircraft shells were worn because it can be expected, mainly women and children. Children and students is mobile at the time of these the way to and from school or movement, and air raid warning is issued that immediately were evacuated suffer this.

Since these parents reusing clothes that were each household is made each others stored as existing and peace article have a variety of patterns and shapes.

Also, as used, such as the current school disaster prevention hood is intended that it can be said that the prototype of, the disaster prevention hood has been developed after the war the material flame-retardant fiber replaced with one of or non-flammable, heat resistance improvement and weight reduction, Although improvement for safety improvement, such as application of reflective tape in consideration of the night of the evacuation has been added, the shape is a former air defense hood largely to basic today.